| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
In 1919, rather than put himself forward for the exams for his degree, he accepted an invitation to the run the History of Art course at the Porto School of Fine Arts, for which he had been proposed by Joaquim de Vasconcelos, putting back for five years the examination of his academic credentials, which he concluded with a mark of nineteen (out of a possible twenty). Himself a conservative republican, in May of the same year he was elected to the Porto City Council, in the lists of the Partido Republicano Evolucionista, and was publicly reprimanded just days later by Leonardo Coimbra’s ministry for having objected to the contentious removal of the Faculty of Letters from Coimbra to the University of Porto. It was in this turbulent environment that, aged around 29, he published his work Templo das Siglas, originally a short study that appeared in the pages of Terra Portuguesa. A case study of the church of Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Ermida (Castro Daire), it took its place as one of the first national monographs dedicated to Romanic Art. Alongside a sharp defence of the safeguarding and restoration of Portuguese heritage, a cause to which Aarão de Lacerda had dedicated himself all his life in his works and his press columns, his writing revealed an author gifted with an objective analysis laid out with a rigorous and scientific vocabulary, fruit of a fine historiographical erudition and an examination of historical documents, valuable for a contextualization of works of art. Although this shows some influences of the Positivist current, in seeking a scientific model of objectivity that distanced itself from the usual subjective judgement of artistic criteria, we can also glimpse the aesthete whose appreciation of beauty and art is reflected in the fair and honest views regarding the context of their creation. |
|||||||||||||