| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
His colleague A. A. Mendes Correia did not agree with him which led to a mild debate, for Damião Peres was no polemicist (Portugal “ex animo portucalensium”. Resposta ao artigo crítico Portugal “ex nihilo”! do Prof. Mendes Correia, 1938). In this text he firmly defends his position and we witness a confrontation between two views: that of the historian, who needs concrete proof to put forward explanatory hypotheses, and that of the geographer and ethnographer who moves from the present to the past without requiring any further proof to establish his basic ideas in time. As Damião Peres concluded: “Prof. Mendes Correia has – I suppose – a naturalist’s background; I, a humanistic background”(p. 10), with the supposition being, of course, the nasty words of a polemicist. But the acrimony between the two former colleagues went no further. |
|||||||||||||