| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
................................ |
|||||||||||||
He adopted a Marxist line of analysis bringing to interpretation, in particular of Contemporary History, a conceptual framework that was rooted both in the perspectives of the utopian socialists who he studied in great depth and in the views of Marx and particularly Engels when applied to the becoming of our contemporaneity. In his explanation for the introduction of liberalism in Portugal, for example, he claimed that “it was not only a political, economic and military struggle against the aristocracy of the Old Regime; there were also social struggles and it is precisely these that form the backdrop to the age”. In fact, both thematically and analytically, such an interpretative perspective of history was in tune with his own ideas which had been cemented in his academic exchange with the historians who had consolidated his education in France. |
|||||||||||||