| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
If his racist message (ius sanguinis) did not pass into the discourse of the official historiography (A. Pimenta, C. Beirão, J. Ameal), it was because not only did it affront the imperial and colonialist view (the ius soli) of the Estado Novo, but because Sardinha himself in the final phase, after 1921-22, re-evaluated and limited its assertions, in particular about Judaism and the alleged Masonic alliance, which were always considered in any case to be promoters of the modern, utilitarian, Faustian civilisation of the capitalism of usury and interest – the ideal of the Pharisees in the language of Sardinha (“Occidentalism and Christianity”; NP, IV, t. I, n.º 4; 243-45) - which subverts the “spiritual”, for which read theological and scholastic, fundaments of ‘western civilization’: “Lords of Oil and Bituminous Coal, your imperialism – the imperialism of the Anglo-Saxons - blackens and depresses the breeding ground of those admirable energies, which issued forth from the Peninsula with its navigators and missionaries.”
|
|||||||||||||