| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
His first historiographical work was the História do Cerco do Porto (History of the Siege of Porto), published in 1846 when he was forty-four. The government had commissioned this work as part of the liberal power’s promotion of historical studies (Sérgio Campos Matos, Historiografia e Memória Nacional no Portugal do Século XIX, pp.491-493). Soriano puts himself in the place of someone who lives through the events from the inside as a member of the liberating army in the lowest rank of the military hierarchy alongside the ordinary soldiers. It is from this position that he analyzes and evaluates the civil war and the characters of the main protagonists. He nurtures a pet hate for some figures, in particular for Saldanha whom he accuses of being a “turncoat”. As for the leaders, Palmela is seen as “timid and weak” and D. Pedro as “inconstant and unstable”. The only person who deserves his unconditional admiration is Bernardo Sá Nogueira, the future Marquis of Sá da Bandeira. In a letter to Joaquim Martins de Carvalho dated 1881, the writer unburdens himself: “apart from the Marquis of Sá, I take to my grave not the smallest jot of consideration for any of our rulers, past or present, but only a pungent distaste” (in Brito Aranha, Op.Cit., p.218). |
|||||||||||||