| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
Tellingly, many unrelated or anonymous writings were wrongly attributed to him, as shown by small corrections made by Rogério Fernandes to his bibliography (Esboço bibliográfico da obra de F. Adolfo Coelho, 'Bibliographical Outline of the Work of F. Adolfo Coelho, 1973, pp. 203-231), suggesting that Adolfo Coelho was considered the author 'by default' of anything written on education in Portugal. The official nature of much of his work, a sign of recognition by the state, certainly lead to these exaggerations of authorship. On the other hand, this does not prepare us to find, in a creator and agent of educational policies, insistent praise for traditional forms of transmission of popular culture as a substitute for the literacy in which modern regimes deposited hope for transformation and the promotion of society and the individual (materialised in 1876 in Cartilha Maternal, by João de Deus, received with widespread controversy). ‘Illiterate people - states Coelho in Cultura e Analfabetismo (Culture and Illiteracy) - have their arts, industries, know-how, their education and even their pedagogy set to rules.’ (Cultura e Analfabetismo, 1916, p. 20). Taking sides in this debate (carefully studied by Sergio Campos Matos, 2002, among others), he added that 'the idea of homeland is by no means strange to those who ignore the arts of reading and writing and cannot know the history of the country through books', an idea that was echoed later on in the image of the Portuguese people outlined by dialectologist Lindley Cintra. |
|||||||||||||