| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
Teixeira da Mota’s study appeared at a time of animated intellectual controversy. On the one hand were the historians who supported the regime; on the other, those who fought against a history transformed into propaganda and enslaved to the political ideologies of an authoritarian state. The “duel” that was to rage between Father Dias Dinis, who brought forward the publication of O V Centenário do Descobrimento da Guiné Portuguesa à Luz da Crítica Histórica (“The 5th Centenary of the Discovery of Portuguese Guinea in the Light of Historical Criticism”) and Duarte Leite, Magalhães Godinho and Damião Peres, bears witness to this intellectual confrontation. Teixeira da Mota – a 26-year-old naval officer – consciously took one side: that of a scientific history that helps us understand the past and society. The role of his study on the discovery of Guinea (1946) was solely that of a contribution designed to help clarify the ongoing debate. |
|||||||||||||