| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Foreigners | |||||||||||||
Regarding his pioneering writing on the history of economic ideas in Portugal (1976), as well as clear signs of the so-called Historical School — the importance given to the nosce te ipsum, the need for a profound knowledge of the national reality in order to correct it — we should emphasize the evident influence of Friedrich List. In line with his thinking, Laranjo went on to rehabilitate various mercantilist authors, as well as others, closer chronologically, who showed heretical inclinations with respect to nineteenth-century liberalism, above all Solano Constâncio, explicitly noted as a Portuguese precursor to List and his “national economy” (Idem, p. 88). In fact, he attempted as a rule to locate Portuguese authors in line with schools at a European level, not with the intention of inventing any “Portuguese” school or the like, and even less as an apology for any type of agrarian theory, but rather to suggest that there was a certain adhesion to physiocratic ideas amongst some writers of the late eighteenth century. Laranjo claimed that, by his proposals, Domingos Vandelli “shows himself to be a physiocrat” (idem, Ibidem, p. 43), though without expressing by this characterization any sympathy — rather the contrary. The study of the history of economic thought that he undertook can, taken as a whole, be integrated into his simultaneous concern for historiography, industry, and “social” matters, that is, closely related to the “historical school” and “academic socialism” (Kathedersozialismus), which were characteristic of a wide movement of European authors at this time (As Ideias Económicas e Sociais de José Frederico Laranjo, pp. 488–527). |
|||||||||||||